In a discussion about dietary changes, when a coach helps a client explore both sides of making a change, which skill is being demonstrated?

When a coach assists a client in exploring both sides of making a dietary change, they are demonstrating the skill of exploring decisional balance. This approach involves examining the pros and cons or advantages and disadvantages of a specific decision. By facilitating this exploration, the coach helps the client clarify their motivations and potential barriers related to the change. This process promotes greater understanding and can empower clients to make informed decisions.

In contrast, enhancing self-efficacy focuses on building a client's confidence in their ability to succeed with the changes. Double-sided reflections involve restating different perspectives the client holds about an issue, which emphasizes ambivalence but does not directly encourage a decision-making process. Appreciative inquiry centers around identifying and building on strengths rather than weighing options. Exploring decisional balance specifically targets the evaluation of choices, making it the most relevant skill in this context.